Conclusionĭespite its benefit for glycemic control during hospitalization, this review did not show that use of the BB scheme decreases clinical events in patients hospitalized in a conventional ward. There was a nonsignificant trend to an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the BB group (OR 2.29 ). Overall, there was a nonsignificant trend to a lower risk of adverse events in the BB as compared to the SS group (OR 0.67, ). Patients in the BB group had better blood glucose control than those with SS. ResultsĪ total of 957 citations were collected, of which nine were finally included in the systematic review. A random effects model with the Mantel–Haenszel procedure was used. The Odds ratio was the main summary measure. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness to reduce clinical adverse events and safety of insulin administered in basal-bolus-corrector or basal-corrector regimens (BB) versus a sliding scale scheme (SS) in patients with diabetes or newly diagnosed hyperglycemia admitted to a conventional (not critical) medical or surgical hospital ward.
